I'm a happy
Ravelry member, even though I am currently in a knitting doldrum. I don't use all the features, but I do use enough to make me feel happy and like I am getting value for my intellectual property.
I'm also a member of
PatternReview.com, which appears similar. Both sites, after all, are essentially wikis which harness the experience and intellectual property of a community of crafters to the benefit of the community. Which is why when you search on ravelry for Artyarns Beaded Silk, one of the photograps you see will be mine, and I pay for the photographic hosting, and I am glad to have the photo credit. It's why you can see that at least
85 people have made the hat that LT wrote up, and why, if you search on pirate hat on ravelry, you get that one. YAY! It's also why, when you search on, say
Burda 8677, the first hit is Pattern Review, because it is more useful and relevant than the company's site.
Pattern Review is not as pretty, not as web-2.0. It doesn't have automagical links to Flickr and Picasa, and the search functions within feel a little clunky, but Ravelry is, I think, awesomely usable. PR also offers online classes and some other features. And they have a feature that I think Ravelry would do well to imitate -- the review template, where you can fill in a standard set of questions about how the garment you made from the pattern turned out. But in other ways, I don't enjoy PR as much. Their revenue model is not (highly-pertinent! unobstrusive!) advertising, but a subscription model, with deliberately limited* account privileges (AND text advertising). Like you can't see all of a pattern review unless you are a member, and unless you are a
paying member, you cannot add more than 20 patterns to your pattern catalog. grrr
Mind you, Flickr does this too, but 1) I know that storing pictures actually costs money, real money, and 2) Flickr gets none of my intellectual property. I upload pictures, sure, but I don't craft reviews, or post pictures specific to other people's needs. Flickr is much less community-based than PR. I'm not saying that whoever is running PR doesn't deserve money to pay them for their time and to keep their servers running, but for some reason, with the Ravelry model in front of me, I am cranky about shelling out $30/year. It's possible, too, that I don't sew/review/read enough to make it worth that money to me. Or it could be that I expect my investment of content should be rewarded and celebrated. I am part of the community value if I post reviews, whether or not I pay.
The other obvious comparison is LJ. I do pay for my account, because I value it the same way I value flickr. It is a place for me to store my content, even if I am not contributing to the greater community. Also, I hate the ads.
tl;dr - I want to either pay for my community in cash or intellectual property, but not both.
*Wiscon and its membership have done a good job of pointing out to me the ickiness of saying that software is "crippled" or "disabled". I am trying to be mindful about talking about limited things with less ableist language.